Jump to main content

Quicklinks

Institution logo

Examination regulations for the German-Turkish Bachelor's degree program

Examination regulations

for the German-Turkish Bachelor's Degree Program in Law of the Faculties of Law of the University of Cologne and Istanbul
Altınbaş University
dated September 23, 2024

- unofficial reading version -

Table of contents

§ 1 Scope of regulation

1Theseexamination regulations govern the course of study, the examination procedure and the academic degree to be awarded for the German-Turkish Bachelor's degree program in Law at the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University. 2Thecontents and requirements of the modules are regulated in the appendix.

§ 2 Study objective

1Teachingand studies provide students with the
necessary specialist knowledge, skills and methods, taking into account the requirements and changes in the professional world and the interdisciplinary references, in accordance with the course of study, so that they are enabled to carry out scientific or artistic work, to apply
scientific knowledge and methods in professional practice, to critically classify scientific knowledge and to act responsibly.
2The course of study serves the integrated training in German and Turkish law. 3The aimof the first stage of studies at the University of Cologne is also to complete the intermediate examination as defined by the Lawyers' Training Act of North Rhine-Westphalia in conjunction with the study and examination regulations for the Law degree course leading to the first
examination of the Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne, as amended.

§ 3 Academic degrees

Upon successful completion of the program, the double degree "Bachelor of Laws (LL.B. Cologne/İstanbul Altınbaş) and "Hukuk Lisansı" is awarded by the Faculties of Law
of the Universities of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş.

§ 4 Start of studies, standard period of study, study organization

(1) 1Thecourse can only be started in the winter semester. 2Thestandard period of study is eight semesters; the standard period of study for each study section is four semesters.

(2) 1Students are responsible for planningand implementing their studies. 2Thecourse of study shall be organized by the law faculties of the Universities of Cologne and İstanbul
Altınbaş in such a way that the course can be completed within the standard period of study. 3Thelaw faculties of the Universities of Cologne and İstanbul
Altınbaş shall ensure that students receive appropriate
support in organizing their studies, including through course-specific advice and measures to evaluate and ensure the quality of teaching.


(3) 1Astudy plan shall be drawn up and made available in a suitable form. 2Thisstudy plan is not part of the examination regulations.

§ 4a Admission and admission requirements

(1) 1The admission requirementfor the Bachelor's degree course, even when applying for a higher semester, is the general higher education entrance qualification. 2Degreesacquired abroad
are classified by the admissions committee on the basis of the assessment proposals provided by the Central Office for Foreign Education at the Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs
within the anabin database.


(2) Applicants who have not obtained their higher education entrance qualification in German must provide proof of sufficient knowledge of the German language with at least level B 2 in accordance with the University of Cologne's regulations for the German language examination for university admission in the currently valid version.


(3) 1Sufficientcommand of Turkish in accordance with the regulations for university admission at Altınbaş University İstanbul is also a prerequisite. 2This
proof can also be provided by completing a Turkish legal terminology course for advanced students at the Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne with at least
the grade "fully satisfactory" by the end of the 2nd semester at the University of Cologne
.


(4) 1Applicantswith a higher education entrance qualification issued by a German authority may apply for the study places awarded by the University of Cologne. 2Theselection and admission of applicants forthese study places allocated by the University of Cologne is based on the relevant provisions of the Act on Admission to Higher Education in North Rhine-Westphalia, the Ordinance on the Allocation of Study Places in North Rhine-Westphalia, the Framework Regulations for the Implementation of Selection Procedures in Admission-Restricted Degree Courses at the University of Cologne and the provisions of the Regulations on the Admission of Foreign Students at the University of Cologne, as amended. 3Theapplication for admission must be submitted by post or electronically to the Center for International Relations of the Faculty of Law by July 15 of each year. 4Itis only valid for the allocation of study places for the coming semester.


(5) 1Applicationswith a school-leaving certificate issued by a Turkish authority must be submitted exclusively to Altınbaş University İstanbul. 2Admissionand selection for the degree program is carried out for applicants at Altınbaş University İstanbul via the ÖSYM (Turkish Central Office for the Allocation of Study Places) in accordance with its own regulations.


(6) If the applicant has a higher education entrance qualification that was not issued by either a German or a Turkish authority,
he or she is free to apply for the Bachelor's degree program either at the University of Cologne or at Altınbaş University in İstanbul.

§ 5 Structure of the degree program

(1) The degree program initially lasts two years at the Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne and then two years at the Faculty of Law
at İstanbul Altınbaş University.


(2) 240 credit points (CP) must be acquired during the course.


(3) 1Thedegree program at the University of Cologne comprises courses amounting to 120 credit points. 2Thedegree program at İstanbul Altınbaş University comprises
courses amounting to 120 credit points. 3Asa rule, 30 credit points must be earned per semester.


(4) The degree program is successfully completed when both study sections have been successfully completed in accordance with paragraph 3.


(5) 1Thecourse comprises 28 modules. 2The first stage of study at the University of Cologne comprises 10 modules. 3Thesecond stage of study at
İstanbul Altınbaş University comprises 18 modules including the Bachelor's thesis module (M11). 4Theindividual modules in the first study section at the University of Cologne are listed in the
module overview in the appendix.

(6) 1In order tobe allowed to enter the second stage of studies at İstanbul Altınbaş University, all modules of the first
stage of studies, with the exception of modules M7, M8, must be completed in accordance with paragraph 5. 2Therelevant modules are listed in the module overview in the appendix.


(7) The regulations of the study and examination regulations for
the Law degree program at İstanbul Altınbaş University, as amended, shall apply accordingly to the implementation, duration, evaluation and announcement of the results of the module examinations and the performance consisting of them within the framework of
courses and homework at the Faculty of Law of İstanbul Altınbaş University, unless otherwise stated in these regulations. § Section 21 remains unaffected
.

§ 6 Modules

(1) The degree program is structured in modules.


(2) 1Modularizationis the combination of subject areas into thematically and chronologically related, self-contained teaching units that are awarded credit points
. 2Thecontent of a module shall be calculated in such a way that it can generally be taught within one semester or within two semesters
. 3Inparticularly justified cases, a module may also extend over more than two semesters.


(3) 1Modulesgenerally have a scope of 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 credit points. 2Moduleswith 6 credit points can generally be completed in one semester, the others generally
in a maximum of two semesters.


(4) A distinction is made between the following module types:
a) Core modules serve to impart basic knowledge,
b) Advanced modules build on the basic modules and serve to deepen the acquired knowledge and individual skills,
c) Specialization modules serve to define an individual focus through specialization,
d) Supplementary modules are not firmly anchored in the course of study and serve to round off the degree programme individually.


(5) Modules can be offered as compulsory modules, compulsory elective modules or elective modules

a) Compulsory modules must be studied; they are shown as such in the module overview in the appendix,
b) Compulsory elective modules must be selected from a predefined list and must be studied in accordance with the provisions of the module overview in the appendix,
; They are shown as such in the module overview in the appendix,
c) 1Elective modulesare freely selectable, course-specific modules from a defined range, which can be completed voluntarily and in addition to the provisions in the appendix; they are not taken into account when determining the overall grade in accordance with Section 18 (3).2Elective modules are identified as such in the module overview in the appendix.


(6) 1Regulationson the individual modules and the final examinations are specified in the module overview in the appendix. 2These include in particular
a) Module identification number,
b) Title of the module,
c) Module participation requirements,
d) Start of the module,
e) Frequency of the module,
f) Duration of the module in semesters,
g) Course types of the module and participation obligations,
h) Examination requirements,
i) Examination form, form and duration of the module examination, if applicable
Examination elements and their passing and repetition modalities,
j) Examination language,
k) Examination restrictions,
l) Designation as compulsory or compulsory elective module, elective module
m) Credit points of the module,
n) Requirements for the awarding of credit points,
o) For compulsory elective modules: Proportion of the module's credit points to the
credit points in the relevant compulsory elective area,
p) Weighting of the module grade for the overall grade.


(7) 1Theawarding of credit points requires the completion of the respective module. 2Modulescan be completed by passing a final module examination and
or by completing other work. 3Theprovisions of § 12 apply tomodule examinations.


(8) If a module examination consists of several examination elements, these generally represent different forms of examination or
forms of examination in accordance with Section 12 (2) to (6).


(9) 1Participationin modules or elements of modules may be linked to prerequisites. 2Theprerequisites are listed in the module overview in the appendix
.


(10) 1Theindividual modules are listed in the module overview in the appendix to these examination regulations. 2Thecourses listed in the modules
are continuously updated and supplemented by the Examination Board.

§ 7 Credit point system and general criteria for awarding credit points

(1) 1Thesuccessful completion of modules is certified by the award of credit points. 2Credit pointsare calculated according to the expected workload of the students and are a quantitative measure of the total workload of the students. 3Theycomprise the time required to attend the courses as well as for the preparation and follow-up of the course material (attendance and self-study), the preparation for examinations and the examination workload, including the final papers and coursework and, if applicable, the internships. 4Credit pointsare equivalent to credits according to the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System. 5Onecredit point corresponds to an average workload of approximately 30 hours. 6Asa rule, 60 credit points are earned per academic year. 7Theprerequisites required for the successful completion of a module are listed in the appendix. 8Theprerequisites may include examinations and/or coursework. 9Examination achievementsare graded achievements in accordance with § 63 Para. 1 HG , which determine the success of the course and are generally included in the overall grade of the degree program. 10Theyare carried out in the forms specified in § 12 and the appendices. 11Study achievements, on the other hand, serve to assess the learning status of teachers and students, can be repeated indefinitely and are not included in the calculation of the grade. 12Study achievementsare generally provided in the following formats: Electronic learning assessments, essays, exercises,homework, short papers, protocols, reviews, test examinations, thesis papers and similar formats. 13 Ifcoursework requires attendance in a course for which regular attendance is not required in accordance with Section 9 (4), the chairperson of the Examination Board shall, in justified exceptional cases, allow students to complete alternative coursework that does not require attendance in the course, provided that this is suitable for promoting the acquisition of skills and the assessment of learning progress in a comparable manner.


(2) 1Credit pointsare awarded if the coursework and/or examinations required in the respective module have been proven or passed. 2Section 48 (5) HG applies to the acquisition of credit points in the case of leaves of absence. 3Studyand examination achievements from modules that have not been completed can be shown in the transcript of records.

§ 8 Studium Integrale

(1) 1TheStudium Integrale (SI) is an interdisciplinary component of the degree program. 2Itcan have both an academic science-related orientation and a professional orientation, which serve to develop professional skills.


(2) The Studium Integrale is intended to promote and impart skills that go beyond individual subject-specific knowledge or that relate to basic academic and personal
attitudes: Scientific curiosity, systematic and analytical thinking, dealing with complexity, solution orientation and other skills,
for example, the ability to work in a team and foreign language skills.


(3) 1TheStudium Integrale program is offered by the faculties as well as by the ProfessionalCenter and the International Office of the University of Cologne. 2The
Studium Integrale should not include any courses from the student's own degree program. 3Further detailscan be found in the module overview in the appendix. 4Notwithstanding
the regulations in sentence 2, students may not take any courses in their own subject in the Studium Integrale that are designed exclusively for students of other degree programs
.


(4) 1TheStudium Integrale comprises 12 credit points and is formally considered a module. 2By way of derogationfrom Section 7 (2), the courses and the study program may extend over the entire
course. 3Further detailscan be found in the module overview in the appendix. 4Examinations aspart of the Studium Integrale are not subject to an attempt restriction.
5The module remains ungraded.


(5) 1Practicalactivities and work completed before commencing the degree programme as well as qualifying periods abroad can be recognized or credited as part of the Studium Integrale
. 2The Examination Board may issue general regulations regarding the recognition of achievements within the framework of the Studium Integrale.


(6) 1The planningand realization of the Studium Integrale is the responsibility of the students. 2Thefaculties, the ProfessionalCenter and the International Office of the University of Cologne offer
appropriate study advice.

§ 9 Courses

(1) 1Studentsshould register for courses in the online-based campus management system of the University of Cologne. 2Studentsmust also document their attendance at
on a semester-by-semester basis by entering it in their record sheet, which is available on the website of the Registrar's Office. 3Acourse registration does not constitute
registration for an examination.


(2) Courses are generally offered in the following forms:
a) Lecture: Coherent presentation and teaching of basic and specialist academic knowledge and methodological knowledge, usually in individual courses spread periodically over a semester.
b) Seminar: Discursive engagement with fundamental or advanced issues.
c) Exercise: Course accompanying a lecture or seminar. Discussion of given exercises and consolidation of learning content through independent development or acquisition and consolidation of knowledge by working on tasks or carrying out experiments.
d) Work placement: Acquisition and consolidation of knowledge by working on practical tasks. An internship can be carried out at the university (e.g. administration) or outside the university (e.g. administration of justice, administration).
e) Excursion: Course outside the university for the purpose of visualization. Students recognize aspects of subject content in reality, record relevant factors/structures based on observations and practice applying the knowledge they have acquired or draw
scientific conclusions.
f) Language course: Course that serves to acquire and/or deepen foreign language skills.
g) Project: Action-oriented, independent work on a complex task or problem in successive phases (planning, implementation, presentation of results), usually within a predetermined period of time.
h) As a rule, accompanying course to basic courses. Working techniques are practiced in small groups and basic knowledge is deepened; the complex content of the main course is explained to
students or the theoretical content is illustrated using practical examples.
i) Working groups: The application of the legal doctrinal knowledge acquired in lectures and self-study to specific situations is practiced (case solution training).


(3) The forms of course according to paragraph 2 may be offered in a combined form.


(4) 1Ifit is necessary to limit the number of participants in a course due to its nature or purpose or for other reasons of research, artistic development projects, teaching, the practice of art or
patient care and if the number of applicants exceeds the capacity,
the number of participants may be limited in accordance with Section 59 (2) HG. 2Studentswho are dependent on attending a
course at this point in their studies are to be given priority. 3Furtherdetails, in particular the criteria for prioritization, are regulated by the faculty in its own
regulations. 4Withinthe framework of the resources available, it shall be ensured that students do not lose any time due to the restrictions on the number of participants according to
possibilities.


(5) 1Admissionto an examination or the awarding of credit points may require regular participation in courses in modules and their assessment. 2The relevantprovisions are listed in the module overview in the appendix. 3Orderingregular attendance is only permissible if it is proportionate and the learning objective can only be achieved through regular attendance. 4As a rule, thisis the case if at least one of the following reasons applies:
a) The obligation to demonstrably participate regularly in modules or courses arises from the introduction and practice of academic discourse, which is the primary and defining element and essential learning objective of the module or course. Academic discourse is characterized by the presentation of academic questions and arguments and the student's own positioning as well as critical reflection and mutual exchange on what has been presented.
b) The obligation to demonstrably participate regularly in modules or courses results from the didactic design of the course, which provides for permanently participative, interactive and cooperative teaching and learning formats as well as reflection on the content and results under guidance in order to achieve the learning objective.
c) The obligation to provide evidence of regular participation in modules or courses is stipulated by legal provisions.
d) The obligation to provide evidence of regular participation in modules or courses arises from the need to acquire practical skills and abilities that cannot be acquired in any other way and to test, practise and reflect on them under supervision.
e) The obligation to demonstrably participate regularly in modules or courses arises from the need to practise sign language or oral or written language skills and abilities as well as their practical linguistic execution and reflection in the context of communicative and personal interaction under supervision.
f) The obligation to demonstrate regular participation in modules or courses arises from the need to examine content-related objects and contexts in situations and to acquire practical or professionally relevant skills and abilities depending on the location and situation, including non-university learning locations.
5Verifiable regular attendance is generally given if the absences do not exceed 20%. 6In particularin the case of internships and excursions, this may be deviated from
. 7The relevantregulations are set out in the appendices.8 Ifattendance is compulsory, absences cannot be compensated by other
work. 9 Section17 (2) to (4) remains unaffected. 10 Regular participation in the courses as well as their preparation and follow-up is recommended.

§ 10 Academic advising, subject-specific academic advising, examination advising

(1) 1 Legally bindinginformation on examination requirements and examination performance is provided by the Chairperson of the Examination Board, their deputy
or their deputy, the Head of the Center for International Relations of the Faculty of Law (ZIB Jura) and their deputy
. 2TheZIB Jura is the admissions and examination office as well as the advisory and support office for the Bachelor's degree course in German
Turkish Law (Cologne/İstanbul).


(2) 1Forgeneral study advice, in particular about study options and study requirements, the Central Student Advisory Service of the University of Cologne is available at
2Faculty-wideadvisory services are available for interdisciplinary study advice.

(3) 1Thesubject-specific study guidance is provided by the university lecturers and academic staff involved in the education in this
degree program during office hours. 2Theconsultation hours are announced on notice boards in the institutes and on the Internet. 3The use of
an individual student advisory service is recommended.

(4) The General Students' Committee (AStA) and the Law Student Council as well as the student association Deutsch-Türkische Rechtswissenschaftler e.V. offer advice on
general questions regarding the organization of studies.


(5) The Department 9: International Affairs of the University of Cologne and
the ZIB Jura offer advice on special questions of foreign students and for the preparation of studying abroad.


(6) In case of study-related personal difficulties, the Psycho-Social Counseling of the Kölner Studierendenwerk can be consulted.

(7) Students with disabilities or chronic or mental illnesses can seek advice from the University Administration (Inclusion Service Center) and the
representative for students with disabilities or chronic illnesses.

§ 11a Recognition of services

(1) For the purposes of these regulations, the term recognition means the recognition of academic achievements within the meaning of Section 63a (1) HG.

(2) 1Achievementsthat have been completed in degree programmes at other state or state-recognized higher education institutions, at state or state-recognized vocational academies or in degree programmes at foreign state or state-recognized higher education institutions or in another degree programme at the same higher education institution shall be recognized upon application, provided that there is no significant difference between the acquired competences and the achievements that are being replaced; an assessment of equivalence shall not take place. 2Thesame shall apply with regard to degrees with which degree courses within the meaning of sentence 1 have been completed.

(3) 1Ifcredits arerecognized, the grades shall be adopted and included in the calculation of the overall grade, provided the grading systems are comparable. 2In the case of
incomparable grading systems, the note "passed" shall be included. 3Therecognition shall be marked in the certificates of completed work.

(4) Recognition of work completed elsewhere is not possible if this work has already been completed at the University of Cologne.

(5) 1Studentsmust submit the documents required for recognition in electronic form. 2Ifthere is any doubt as to the authenticity of the documents submitted electronically
, the responsible examination board chairperson may request the submission of the original documents or a certified copy. 3Applicationsfor recognition
must be submitted in writing or electronically to ZIB Jura. 4Thechairperson of the examination board decides onrecognition. 5Asa rule, subject representatives must be heard during the recognition procedure. 6As a rule, thedecision must be made within three months and the applicant must be notified immediately by entering the recognition information in the campus management system; reasons for the rejection of recognition must be given in writing or electronically. 7Ifthe recognition sought on the basis of an application within the meaning of paragraph 2 is refused, the applicant may request a review of the decision by the Rectorate, notwithstanding the time limits under procedural law. 8The Rectorate shall make a recommendation to the chairperson of the Examination Board regarding the further handling of the application.


(6) 1In the case ofstays abroad as part of the degree course, students can conclude an agreement with the relevant authorities regarding the credits to be recognized (Learning
Agreement). 2Alearning agreement confirms that there is no significant difference within the meaning of paragraph 2 between the coursework to be completed at the foreign university
and the specified coursework at the University of Cologne. 3Theagreed credits shall be recognized upon written or electronic application by the
student, provided that the other requirements for recognition are met at the time of application.

§ 11b Crediting of benefits

(1) For the purposes of these regulations, the term crediting means the recognition of non-academic achievements within the meaning of Section 63a (7) HG.


(2) 1Uponapplication, knowledge and qualifications acquired in ways other than through a course of study may be recognized on the basis of documents submitted if
these knowledge and qualifications are equivalent in content and level to the achievements they are intended to replace. 2It is not permissible to credit such non-university achievements beyond
half of the examination achievements to be completed.


(3) 1If credits arerecognized, the grades are to be adopted and included in the calculation of the overall grade, provided the grading systems are comparable. 2In the case of
incomparable grading systems, the note "passed" shall be included. 3Thecrediting shall be indicated in the certificates of completed work.

(4) Credit for work completed elsewhere cannot be awarded if this work has already been completed at the University of Cologne.

(5) 1Studentsmust submit the documents required for credit transfer. 2Ifthere is any doubt as to the authenticity of the documents submitted electronically, the responsible examination board chairperson may request the submission of the original documents or a certified copy. 3Applicationsfor credit transfer must be submitted in writing or electronically to ZIB Jura. 4Thechairperson of the examination board decides onthe crediting. 5As a rule, subject representatives must be heard during the crediting procedure. 6As a rule, thedecision must be made within three months and the applicant must be informed immediately by entering the crediting information in the campus management system; reasons for the rejection of crediting must be given in writing or electronically.

§ 12 Forms of examination

(1) 1Asa rule, modules are completed with only one module examination.2Module examinationscan be taken in written, oral, practical or combined form.3Theform of examination must be suitable for testing the learning objectives and learning outcomes conveyed in the module and demonstrating that the candidates have mastered the content and methods of the module in the essential contexts and can apply the knowledge and skills acquired. 4Formodules with 6 credit points, the module examination consists of only one examination element. 5Formodules worth 9 credit points, the module examination may consist of a maximum of two examination elements. 6Formodules comprising 12, 15 or 18 credit points, the module examination may consist of a maximum of three examination elements. 7Ifa module examination consists of several examination elements, these generally represent different examination forms or forms of examination forms in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 6. 8The formand duration or workload of the respective examination are shown in detail in the module overview in the appendix. 9Forserious reasons, the Chair of the Examination Board may determine a different form of examination upon written or electronic application.10 Individualmodules can also be completed without an examination by completing other work. 11Thecorresponding regulations are listed in the module overview in the appendix.


(2) Types of written examinations are generally:
a) Supervised examinations: A supervisory paper (written examination) is a paper to be completed under personal supervision or electronic supervision (video supervision) in which specified tasks are to be completed alone and independently using only the approved aids. In supervised examinations, students are required to demonstrate that they can work on given problems using standard legal methods in a limited amount of time and with limited resources and that they can find their own solutions. The duration of a supervised assignment is generally a minimum of 45 minutes and a maximum of 180 minutes and is specified for the respective supervised assignment in the module overview in the appendix. Supervision work can be carried out in written or electronic form. The regulations in paragraph 7 also apply to supervisory work in electronic form. Supervisory work may also be carried out in whole or in part in the form of an answer-choice procedure in accordance with Section 13.
b) Homework: A homework assignment is an independent written elaboration of a given topic. Case solution homework is homework in which an independent treatment of a given case is to be developed. In addition to demonstrating knowledge of the law, students should in particular show that they are proficient in
researching information and material, structuring content, creating an outline and preparing a written manuscript in the usual form for academic papers - including the rules for citing case law and literature. The duration and scope of the homework are determined by the workload, which is listed in the appendix. Homework must be submitted in electronic form; the examiner may stipulate that it be submitted simultaneously in written form and/or on a physical data carrier. The electronic version should be submitted in the form of a single PDF file. The narrow faculty may also make deviating stipulations regarding the file format and the type of data carrier or transfer; in particular, it may stipulate that the thesis must be submitted in electronic form using the University of Cologne's e-learning systems at
. A declaration with the following wording must be attached to the homework: "I hereby confirm that I have prepared this thesis independently and without the use of any aids other than those specified. All passages that have been taken verbatim or in spirit from published and non-
published third-party writings are marked as such." If both an electronic and a paper version are submitted, the following sentence must be added: "I confirm that the submitted printed version corresponds completely to the submitted electronic version."
c) A take-home exam is the independent written completion of one or more examination tasks within a specified examination period. A take-home exam can be carried out in written or electronic form. The duration and scope of the take-home exam are determined by the workload shown in the module overview in the appendix.
d) An internship report is a written presentation and analysis of the tasks completed in an internal or external internship. An internship report can be written or in electronic form. The duration and scope of the internship report are determined by the workload, which is shown in the module overview in the appendix.
e) A portfolio is made up of several tasks of different types that are to be completed independently and successively without examination supervision and consists of a compilation of individual documents to be prepared by the candidate. The portfolio serves to document and reflect on the learning process, reflects this and is assessed in summary form. The portfolio is usually divided into an introduction, a collection of documents from the study of the module in question and a concluding reflection. Supervisory work and homework within the meaning of paragraph 2 letters a) and b) cannot be part of a portfolio. A portfolio can be kept in written or electronic form. The duration and scope of the portfolio are determined by the workload shown in the appendix.


(3) Types of oral examinations are generally:
a) Oral examinations: In oral examinations, an examination candidate should demonstrate that he or she recognizes the interrelationships of the examination field and is able to classify specific questions in these contexts. Oral examinations are conducted by at least two examiners or by one examiner in the presence of an expert assessor. As a rule, an oral examination lasts a minimum of 10 minutes and a maximum of 20 minutes per candidate and may be conducted in whole or in part via electronic communication. The duration, main course of the examination, subjects and results must be recorded in minutes. Upon request, examination candidates from the same degree program should be allowed to participate in oral examinations as listeners
unless an examination candidate objects. The examiner shall decide on the application according to the number of places available. Participation does not extend to the discussion and announcement of the examination result.
b) Presentation: A presentation serves to present a given topic or subject matter in a limited time. The examination takes place within the framework of a course in the form of a presentation using suitable presentation techniques. A presentation may be carried out in whole or in part in electronic communication. 4Thescope is determined by the workload shown in the module overview in the appendix.
c) Lecture: As part of a lecture, independently developed aspects or perspectives of a subject area are presented in a limited time with the aid of suitable presentation techniques. A lecture can be held in whole or in part in electronic communication. The scope is determined by the workload, which is shown in the module overview in the appendix. The examination usually takes place as part of a course.

(4) Types of practical examination are usually: preparation and conduct of a simulated court or arbitration hearing (moot court), a
simulated mediation or the simulation of another type of negotiation between lawyers.

(5) 1Combinedexaminations are uniform examinations whose examination parts are made up of different examination forms. 2Theexamination components must be suitable
for testing the acquisition of different types of skills and must be related to each other in terms of content. 3Typesof the combined examination form are:
a) In the case of a presentation with written elaboration of the presentation content, the presentation is the focus of the examination. The requirements of paragraph 3 letter b must be observed. The presentation with written elaboration may be carried out in whole or in part in electronic communication. The duration and scope of the examination result from the workload of the module and are listed in the appendix.
b) In the case of a term paper with presentation, the focus of the examination is on the in-depth development of the content of a topic. The requirements of paragraph 2 letter b must be observed. The presentation serves to summarize the topic of the term paper. The term paper with presentation may be carried out in whole or in part in electronic communication
. The duration and scope of the examination result from the workload of the module and are listed in the appendix.
c) A poster presentation is a condensed large-format textual and/or pictorial presentation of scientific research results, methods and findings on a scientific issue and can be carried out in written or electronic form. It serves to document and reflect on the learning process and is accompanied by an oral presentation of results and findings, which can be carried out in whole or in part in electronic communication. The duration and
scope of the poster presentation are determined by the workload, which is listed in the appendix.
d) A workplace-based assessment is an unfinished collection of examination instruments that are suitable for observing behavior (procedures, communication, etc.) in vivo and providing qualified feedback. The assessment instruments are mostly used formatively. To this end, participants work together in groups to which
different goals or interests are assigned. The specific implementation of the examination and the criteria for assessment are explained to the participants in advance. The scope is determined by the workload, which is shown in the appendix.
e) A simulation is an examination of complex, realistic competencies or skills and abilities in vivo using suitable models or actors. The examinations can be carried out as individual examinations or in series (as so-called objective-structured examinations). The examination performance is documented on special documentation sheets (so-called checklists) by one examiner per station. The duration of the examination is determined by the workload shown in the
appendix.
f) A simulation game is a complex scenario of varying duration with realistic and at the same time open-ended problems that have to be solved. Simulation games can be designed competitively (enforcement of a group's solution) or cooperatively (joint solution finding). In addition to knowledge, simulation games test planning-strategic and communicative skills in dealing with and using specialist knowledge in application scenarios. The solutions are not defined in advance, but are the result of planning, negotiations, strategies, tactics and decisions. The scope is determined by the workload, which is shown in the appendix
.
g) Project work is the independent processing of a task or problem in a group or by an individual, from planning through implementation to documentation of the result in written, oral, electronic or other form. The processing time and scope are determined by the workload, which is listed in the appendix.

(6) In suitable cases, examinations may also be carried out as group work or as an oral group examination as determined by the examiner,
if the individual contribution of each group member is clearly recognizable, clearly definable and assessable.

(7) 1Theexaminers shall determine whether the examination will be conducted in presence or in electronic form and whether the examination
will be accompanied in electronic form by video supervision when announcing the examination date in accordance with Section 15 (6). 2Ifthere are serious reasons, a different form of implementation (electronic or face-to-face) may be determined after the examination date has been announced in consultation with
the responsible examination board, provided that this does not put the candidates to be examined at a disadvantage when taking their
examinations. 3Inthe case of an examination conducted in electronic form, examination candidates shall be given sufficient
opportunity to familiarize themselves with the electronic information and communication systems used in the respective examination prior to the examination. 4With regard todata protection regulations and the implementation of video supervision, the provisions of the regulations governing online examinations and video supervision at
University of Cologne shall apply in their current version, with the exception of Section 5 (4) sentences 1 and 2.

(8) 1Disruptionsto the examination process must be reported immediately to the ZIB Jura, addressed to the chairperson of the examination board or to the examiner responsible at
in writing or electronically. 2Theassertion is excluded at the latest if more than three working days have elapsed since the
examination performance.

(9) Certificates of achievement that are also to be assessed for the intermediate examination as part of the Law degree program at the University of Cologne must be completed in accordance with the
regulations of §§ 12 ff. of the Cologne First Examination Study Regulations as amended.

(10) 1TheExamination Board may determine that written examinations are to be pseudonymized. 2Thepapers are then only to be marked with the matriculation and examination number, they may not contain any other references to the name and person of the candidate and in particular are not to be signed. 3Ifhomework is to be submitted pseudonymously, it must be submitted with a separate declaration of authorship; the Examination Office provides a form for this purpose on its website
.

§ 13 Examinations using the answer-choice procedure

(1) 1Anexamination using the answer-choice method is deemed to exist if the minimum performance of the examination candidate required to pass the examination can be achieved
exclusively by marking or assigning the given answers. 2Examinationsor examination questions using the answer
choice method are only permitted if they are suitable for providing evidence that the examination candidate has mastered the content and methods of the
module in the essential contexts and can apply the knowledge and skills acquired.

(2) 1Theexamination questions must be unambiguously comprehensible, free of contradictions, clearly answerable and suitable for determining the
knowledge of the examination candidates to be tested in accordance with paragraph 1 sentence 2. 2Iterations ofthe same examination questions (including the answer options) are permitted. 3Deductionof
points within an examination task is not permitted.

(3) If the examiner - according to the faculty or degree program-specific design of the specific answer choice procedure - is not also the
task setter, but the examiner's role is shifted from the examiner responsible according to the examination regulations to another task setter,
the following paragraphs 4 to 9 also apply.


(4) 1Theexaminer selects the examination material, formulates the questions, determines the possible answers and draws up the assessment rules and the assessment scheme
in accordance with paragraph 6. 2Therequirements for passing the examination must be determined in advance.3 Beforethe examination, the examiner carries out a review process in which the content
and form of the questions are checked by a second examiner.


(5) 1Theexaminer can also create a pool of equivalent examination questions from which the examination candidates are each
given different examination questions to answer. 2Theassignment is made by random selection. 3Theequivalence of the examination questions must be ensured.


(6) 1Theexamination is passed if the examination candidate has achieved at least 60 percent of the total achievable points. 2Ifthe
overall average of the points achieved in an examination minus 12 percent of the overall average is below 60 percent but above 50 percent of the total achievable points, the pass mark is calculated according to this sliding clause. 3Anassessment scheme that only specifies an absolute pass mark is
inadmissible.


(7) 1Theexaminations are to be assessed as follows: If the minimum number of points required to pass the examination has been achieved, the grade shall be

"very good" if at least 80 percent,
"good" if at least 60 but less than 80 percent,
"fully satisfactory" if at least 40 but less than 60 percent,
"satisfactory" if at least 20 but less than 40 percent,
"sufficient" if none or less than 20 percent

of the points achievable beyond this have been achieved. 2Whencalculating the number of points, 0.5 values are interpreted in favor of the examination candidate
. 3Ifthe minimum number of points required to pass the examination is not achieved, the grade is "unsatisfactory (1-3 points)" or "unsatisfactory (0 points)".

(8) 1Ifthere is a conspicuous accumulation of errors in the answers to individual examination tasks during the assessment of examination performance, the examiner shall check the examination tasks in question
immediately and before announcing the examination results as to whether they are incorrect in relation to the requirements in accordance with paragraph 2 sentence 1
. 2Thetasks are to be analyzed post hoc. 3The difficulty index, selectivity index, reliability and distractor analysis provide an indication of the quality of the
questions set. 4Ifthe review reveals that individual examination tasks are incorrect, these must be re-evaluated or not taken into
consideration when determining the examination result. 5Thenumber of examination questions to be taken into account in determining the examination result shall be reduced accordingly. 6Thereduction in the
number of examination tasks after publication of the results may not be to the disadvantage of an examination candidate. 7Ifthe
number of points attributable to the examination tasks to be eliminated exceeds20 percent of the total achievable points, the examination must be repeated in its entirety. 8Thisalso applies
if only part of an examination is to be taken using the answer-choice method.

(9) If an examination consists only partially of examination questions in the answer-choice procedure, this paragraph applies, with the exception of paragraph 8 sentences 7 and 8, only to the examination part created in the
answer-choice procedure.

§ 14 Examination language

1Examinationsare generally conducted in German. 2Ifmodules are conducted in a foreign language, the associated examination is generally also
conducted in the relevant foreign language and indicated accordingly in the module overview in the appendix. 3Itis possible to conduct an examination in other
foreign languages as required by the subject-specific requirements upon reasoned request by a
examination candidate to the Chair of the Examination Board.

§ 15 Registration and admission to examinations

(1) 1Beforeadmission to an examination, it will be checked whether there is a right to take the examination. 2Admissionto and taking of an examination shall be granted if the examination candidate is enrolled in the relevant degree program at the University of Cologne and Istanbul Altınbaş University, with which a corresponding cooperation agreement exists, or is admitted as a secondary student, has registered for the respective examination in due time in accordance with paragraph 2 and, if applicable, fulfills further requirements in accordance with paragraph 3 and there is no reason for refusal in accordance with paragraph 4. 3Deviatingregulations in accordance with the cooperation agreement concerning the degree program between the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University remain unaffected.

(2) 1Admissionto an examination may be subject to the fulfillment of certain requirements. 2Therespective prerequisites for admission to an examination are listed in the
module overview in the appendix.


(3) 1Admissionto an examination shall be refused if the prerequisites in accordance with paragraph 3 or paragraph 4 are not fulfilled. 2Admissionto an examination is also to be refused if the examination candidate has definitively failed an examination required by the examination regulations in the chosen degree program at a higher education institution within the scope of the Basic Law or has lost the right to take the examination; this applies accordingly to degree programs that are significantly related in content to the previous degree program. 3Admissionto an examination shall also be refused if an examination candidate is on leave of absence in accordance with Section 48 (5) HG, unless one of the exceptional cases listed in Section 48 (5) sentences 4 and 5 HG applies.


(4) 1Registrationin the campus management system is required foreach module examination; without registration, there is no entitlement to participation in or assessment of the
examination. 2Registrationis binding and can only be made within the following deadlines:
1. Registration for written examinations is possible up to seven days before the examination date,
2. Registration for homework is possible up to fourteen days before the end of the processing period (statutory deadlines).
4If the deadline falls on a Sunday, a public holiday or a
Saturday, the deadline does not end until the end of the next working day.5 Section 21 (4) applies accordingly to the Bachelor's thesis.

(5) Students who are enrolled in several degree programs at the same time and wish to take an examination that is part of more than one of these degree programs must
specify in which degree program they are taking the examination when registering for this examination.

(6) The right to participate in courses remains unaffected by this.

§ 16 Deregistration, default and withdrawal from examinations

(1) 1Therelevant deregistration deadlines for the module examinations shall be announced by the chairperson of the Examination Board in good time before the examination date by means of a notice or on the Internet in a suitable form. 2Asa rule, deregistration can only be carried out within the following deadlines:
1. Deregistration for homework is possible up to fourteen days before the end of the processing period
2. Deregistration for module examinations in another form of examination is possible up to seven days before the examination date (statutory deadlines).
3Registration is carried out via the online-based campus management system of the University of Cologne. 4Ifthe deadline arithmetically falls on a Sunday, a public
holiday or a Saturday, the deadline does not end until the end of the next working day. 5TheChair of the Examination Board may, by way of exception
, set shorter deadlines; this will be announced on the website of the Faculty of Law of the University of Cologne (official deadlines).

(2) 1Ifan examination candidate does not take part in a module examination set in terms of time and place without a valid reason or if he or she withdraws from the module examination after it has begun without a valid reason, the examination is deemed to have been assessed as "unsatisfactory (00 points)" or "failed". 2The sameapplies if an examination is not completed within the specified processing time. 3Ifan examination is conducted electronically, the examination shall only be deemed to have been completed if the electronic transmission to the responsible body has been fully completed by the end of the processing time. 4Domesticwork that is submitted in physical form can be handed in to the examiner's office during normal office hours to meet the deadline; if sent by post, a legible postmark (not a postage stamp) of the last day of the processing period or an earlier day is required. 5Ifthe student does not hand in an assignment for assessment by the deadline, the assignment is deemed not to have been handed in. 6Ifan assignment is to be submitted in writing and in electronic form, the entire assignment shall be deemed to have been submitted within the deadline if it is submitted on time in only one form. 7Thecompletion deadline cannot be extended without prejudice to the regulations on compensation for disadvantages in accordance with § 17. 8Ifan examination candidate does not attend an oral presentation within the framework of a seminar for which he or she was invited and from which he or she has not effectively withdrawn, the entire seminar, of which the oral presentation is a part, is deemed not to have been attended within the meaning of sentence 1.

(3) 1Ifan examination candidate fails totake part in a module examination or withdraws from the module examination after it has begun, the chairperson of the examination board may refrain from grading the examination performance as "unsatisfactory (0 points)" or "failed" if there are valid reasons for doing so. 2The sameapplies if an examination is not completed within the specified processing time. 3Thereasons given for the delay or withdrawal must be reported to the chairperson of the examination board immediately in writing or electronically and substantiated. 4In the event ofillness, a medical certificate must be submitted. 5Incases of doubt, the submission of a medical certificate may be requested; the costs shall be borne by the University. 6The sameapplies in the case of proven illness of a child to be cared for by an examination candidate or a spouse to be cared for, a registered partner, a relative in a direct line or a relative by marriage within the first degree.

§ 17 Compensation for disadvantages and protective provisions

(1) 1Thespecial interests of students with disabilities, chronic or mental illnesses and students who are subject to the provisions of maternity protection law shall be taken into account in order to ensure their equal opportunities. 2Useof the protective provisions in accordance with the provisions of maternity protection law and in accordance with the deadlines of the Federal Parental Allowance and Parental Leave Act, as amended, shall be made possible upon application; in such cases, examinations may be taken despite leave of absence. 3 Uponapplication, students will be granted appropriate compensation for disadvantages. 4Thedisadvantage to be compensated for or the existence of the prerequisites must be explained and documented; a specialist medical certificate may be requested for this purpose.

(2) 1Theapplication should be submitted at the same time as the application for admission to the examination procedure. 2Ifthe student only becomes aware of the disadvantage later, the application
should be submitted immediately.


(3) Special concerns arising from the need to care for or provide for a spouse, registered partner
, a relative in a direct line or a relative within the first degree of consanguinity shall be given appropriate consideration.

(4) 1Thecompensation for disadvantages is granted on a case-by-case basis. 2Inparticular, itmay grant exceptions with regard to the duration of the examination and permit the use of
aids or assistants. 3Unlessa change in the clinical picture of the illness or disability is to be expected, the compensation for disadvantages should extend to all examinations to be taken during
the course of study.


(5) The necessary determinations and decisions shall be made by the chairperson of the examination board.

§ 18 Assessment of examination results, calculated overall grade

(1) 1Thegrades for the respective examination elements are determined by the respective examiners. 2Apreparatory correction by a person
other than the examiner (pre-correction) may be carried out under the responsibility of the examiner by a corrector who has passed at least the first
state examination or the first examination within the meaning of Section 5 DRiG. 3Theindividual examination performances are to be assessed with one of the following grades and scores:
- very good: a particularly outstanding performance (= 16-18 points);
- good: a performance significantly above the average requirements (= 13-15 points);

- fully satisfactory: a performance that exceeds the average requirements (= 10-12 points);
- satisfactory: a performance that meets average requirements in every respect (= 7-9 points);
- sufficient: a performance that still meets average requirements despite its shortcomings (= 4-6 points);
- unsatisfactory: a performance that suffers from considerable shortcomings and is no longer usable overall (= 1-3 points);
- insufficient: a performance that is completely unusable (= 0 points).
4Intermediate gradesand scores deviating from full numerical values may not be used. 5Anexamination is passed if it has been graded "sufficient (4 points)" or better or has been assessed as "passed". 6 Insofar asindividual grades are combined to form overall grades, the following grade designations correspond to the points determined:
- 14.00-18.00 points: very good;
- 11.50-13.99 points: good;
- 9.00-11.49 points: fully satisfactory;
- 6.50-8.99 points: satisfactory;
- 4.00-6.49 points: sufficient;
- 1.50-3.99 points: unsatisfactory;
- 0-1.49 points: unsatisfactory.


(2) 1TheBachelor's thesis and the associated colloquium shall be assessed by two examiners; the appointment shall be made by the chairperson
of the Examination Board. 2In the event ofa divergent assessment of a performance, the two examiners shall consult with each other.


(3) If a written examination performance that is assessed as "pass" or "fail" is assessed by two examiners, a third examiner shall be appointed by the chairperson of the examination board if the two examiners' assessments
differ, who shall determine the
final assessment.


(4) 1In the case ofcombined examination forms in accordance with § 12 paragraph 5, an overall assessment of the examination performance shall take place. 2Inthe case of grading, the grade is shown in accordance with
paragraph 1.


(5) 1If a module examination consists of several examination elements, the following pass or resit option applies: All examination elements must
be assessed as "passed" or "sufficient (4 points)" or better. 2Allexamination elements of the module examination assessed as "unsatisfactory (1-3 points)" or worse or "fail"
must be repeated. 3Paragraphs 1 to 4 apply accordingly toexamination elements.

(6) 1Theoverall grade of the degree program is calculated as the weighted arithmetic mean of the grades of the two study sections. 2Turkishgrades are converted to the German grading scale according to the
conversion table in the appendix. 3Ifindividual examinations are shown without a grade, the grade of the corresponding
module is calculated as the unweighted arithmetic mean of the graded examinations in this study section; in this case, the weighting of the graded examinations may
deviate accordingly from the weighting shown in the module overview in the appendix. 4Thegrade of the corresponding study section is calculated from the weighted arithmetic mean of the modules. 5Ifmore module examinations aresuccessfully completed in a study section than are required for the successful completion of the degree program according to the examination regulations, the modules of the student's choice are used to calculate the overall grade. 6Theremaining elective modules passed are shown as additional examinations on the transcript of records. 7Ifnot all module examinations required for successful completion of a study section
have been successfully completed or graded as passed, the provisional grade for the study section is calculated as a weighted arithmetic mean of the module examinations already graded. 8Thegrades are included in the overall grade with the following weighting:
a) Grade for the first study section at the University of Cologne in accordance with Section 5 (3): 50%
b) Grade for the second study section at İstanbul Altınbaş University in accordance with Section 5 (3): 50%


(7) 1Gradesare shown with two decimal places and are used in this form for further calculations; all further decimal places are deleted without rounding. 2Theoverall grade of the degree program is shown with two decimal places. 3Allfurther decimal places are deleted without rounding.

§ 19 Announcement of the examination results

(1) 1As a rule, examination candidates will be notified of theassessment of examinations within nine weeks by uploading the
assessment information to the campus management system. 2Ifthere is a deviation from this rule, the reasons must be recorded. 3Theresult of an
oral examination will be communicated to the examination candidate following the examination.

(2) The notification of the final failure of an examination or a failed Bachelor's thesis will be sent to the examination candidate
formally to the postal address stored in the campus management system or sent electronically and accompanied by information on legal remedies.

§ 20 Repetition of module examinations

(1) 1Withinthe scope of the corresponding modules offered by the Faculty of Law of the University of Cologne, examinations may be repeated at any time up to the completion of the degree program. 2Thenumber of examination attempts per module may be limited to three, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 21 (11). 3Further detailscan be found in the module overview in the appendix. 4Amaximum of three additional examination attempts beyond the number of regular examination attempts available can be granted throughout the course of study in relation to all modules of the Bachelor's degree program in which the number of examination attempts is limited to three by disregarding failed attempts. 5Inaddition, a further failed attempt will not be taken into account if the examination candidates have already acquired at least 140 credit points at the time of the decision. 6Theadditional examination attempts granted by not taking failed attempts into account can be used both for a single module and for different modules. 7 Failedattempts in accordance with sentences 4 and 5 will only be disregarded if a successful degree is still possible at the time of the decision, taking into account all remaining regular and additional examination attempts. 8Ifan examination is not passed after all regular and additional examination attempts have been exhausted, the degree course is definitively failed with the consequence of de-registration from the degree course. 9 Sentences 4 and 5 do not apply to the Bachelor's thesis module. 10Exceptionsare regulated by the Examination Board.


(2) If an examination candidate has failed a module examination for which the number of examination attempts is limited to three in accordance with paragraph 1 sentence 2 for the third time
, the chairperson of the Examination Board shall be informed in writing or electronically whether additional examination attempts in accordance with paragraph 1 sentences 4 and 5 will be granted for
this examination.


(3) The following applies to additional examination attempts granted in accordance with paragraph 1 sentences 4 and 5 in compulsory elective modules: If an examination candidate has failed a module examination in a compulsory elective module for which the number of examination attempts is limited to three in accordance with paragraph 1 sentence 2 for the third time, additional examination attempts are only granted for the same compulsory elective module.


(4) Additional examination attempts can only be granted for a module examination if none of the examination attempts in the module in question have been failed due to cheating or
a breach of regulations in accordance with Section 24.

(5) 1Beforetaking the first additional examination attempt granted in accordance with paragraph 1, it is strongly recommended that students take advantage of counseling opportunities. 2Theexamination candidate
or the examination candidate will receive a written or electronic invitation to a consultation for this purpose, which will also provide information on the available consultation options.

(6) If a module examination consists of several examination elements, the retake options in accordance with Section 18 (5) apply.

(7) In the case of repeat examinations, the chairperson of the examination board may, at the request of the examiner, specify a different examination form or different
characteristics of the respective examination form.

(8) In the case of repeat examinations, deviations from the deadlines in accordance with Section 15 (1) and (2) may be made in justified cases.

(9) The repetition of a Bachelor's thesis is carried out in accordance with § 22 paragraph 11.

(10) 1Ifa student hasnot completed a maximum of four of the
credits required according to the module overview in the appendix at the earliest after the fourth semester and at the latest by the end of the eighth semester at the University of Cologne, with the exception of M7 and M8, if a transfer to the
partner university is intended after the semester in question and an attempt has been made to pass the corresponding written module examination in the semester in question, the
chairperson of the Examination Board may, upon request, grant him or her the opportunity to demonstrate the necessary knowledge in a subsequent oral examination. 2Suchan
examination is possible after the fourth, sixth or eighth semester at the University of Cologne; the date of the oral re-examination is before the end of the semester, usually before September 1 at
. 3Thereshould be at least five days betweenthe examination board notifying the examination candidate of the oral re-examination and
the oral re-examination. 4There-examination is conducted by an examiner. 5Thecertificate of passing
the oral re-examination shall be regarded as proof of achievement for the underlying module or partial module examination within the meaning of these regulations. 6 Aterm paper or the Bachelor's thesis cannot
be replaced by an oral re-examination.


(11) For repeat examinations and re-examinations at İstanbul Altınbaş University, the relevant provisions of the Faculty of Law of İstanbul
Altınbaş University apply.

§ 21 Bachelor thesis module

(1) The Bachelor's thesis is an examination in the form of independently written work which is intended to demonstrate that the examination candidate is able to
work on and reflect on a thematically limited problem from the subject area of the degree program using the required methods within a specified period of time
.

(2) 1TheBachelor's thesis is completed during the course of study. 2TheBachelor's thesis is awarded 9 credit points. 3Therequirements for admission to the Bachelor's thesis are listed in the module overview in the appendix.

(3) 1TheBachelor's thesis can also be written in the form of a group thesis if the individual contribution of each individual examination candidate is clearly recognizable, clearly definable and assessable. 2Theassignment of the individual contribution shall be based on objective criteria that enable a clear
delimitation, for example by specifying sections, page numbers or focal points of the content. 3Thetotal amount of work required for a group thesis
must exceed the requirements for an individual Bachelor's thesis to a reasonable extent. 4Thelevel of difficulty and content of a group thesis for the
individual examination candidate must be such that it meets the requirements for an individual and independent examination.
5The individual contribution of each candidate must meet the requirements for a Bachelor's thesis.

(4) 1Inaccordance with Section 23 (7), the Chair of the Examination Board appoints an examiner to set the topic of the Bachelor's thesis (topic setter) and appoints a further examiner for a second assessment (second assessor). 2Theexamination candidate has the right to make suggestions regarding the topic and the choice of the topic provider. 3Theprocessing period begins on the day on which the topic setter effectively appointed in accordance with sentence 1 sets the topic to be worked on and informs the examination candidate of this; this date is sent to the chair of the examination committee in writing or electronically by the topic setter. 4Thedate on which the topic is issued must be recorded. 5Thetopic may be returned once within two weeks of being issued.


(5) 1Theprocessing time for the Bachelor's thesis is a maximum of six months from the date the topic is issued. 2TheBachelor's thesis consists of a written paper of at least 30,000 characters (excluding spaces). 3Thecontent and scope of the topic of the Bachelor's thesis must be such that it can be completed within the period specified in sentence 1. 4Uponjustified written or electronic application, the Chair of the Examination Board may grant a grace period of a maximum of six weeks; the application must be submitted to the Examinations Office before the deadline expires. 5Such an individual case is to be assumed in particular if there is a significant restriction of performance relevant to examination law, which must be proven, or in the case of circumstances which significantly impair the examination candidate in taking the examination, for which he or she is not responsible and which are directly linked to the content of the Bachelor's thesis. 6Thedecision on the existence of a justified individual case is the responsibility of the Chair of the Examination Board. 7Inthe case of a decision in accordance with sentence 5, last half-sentence, he or she shall consult the person submitting the topic before making a decision.

(6) 1TheBachelor's thesis must be written in German or Turkish. 2By way of derogation fromthis, the chairperson of the examination board may allow the Bachelor's thesis to be written in another language at the request of the examination candidate and with the consent of the supervisor, provided that the assessment is ensured.

(7) 1Theprovisions of good scientific practice apply to the preparation of the Bachelor's thesis. 2TheBachelor's thesis must not have been submitted in the same or a similar form as part of another examination. 3Ifthis is violated, the thesis shall be graded as "unsatisfactory (0 points)". 4The decision is made by the examination board.

(8) 1TheBachelor's thesis contains a list of the aids used. 2Inaddition, it must be accompanied by a declaration with the following wording: "I hereby declare in lieu of oath
that I have written this thesis [title of thesis] independently and without the use of any aids other than those specified. All passages taken verbatim or
analogously from published and unpublished third-party writings are identified as such. The thesis has not yet been submitted in the same or a similar form in the
context of another examination." 3Ifa paper version is submitted in addition to the electronic version in accordance with paragraph 9 sentence 3, the following sentence must be added: "I confirm that the submitted printed version corresponds in full to the submitted electronic version." 4Ifthe affirmation in lieu of an oath is submitted incorrectly, the legal consequences pursuant to Section 63 (5) HG may apply.


(9) 1TheBachelor's thesis must be submitted on time in electronic form (PDF/A only) to the ZIB Jura as the responsible examination office at the University of Cologne or to the
responsible examination office at İstanbul Altınbaş University; the date of submission must be recorded. 2Ifthe Bachelor's thesis isnot submitted on time, it shall be graded as
"unsatisfactory (0 points)". 3Atthe request of the examiner, a paper version identical to the electronic version must also be submitted to the examiner for assessment purposes; the student must affirm that the paper version corresponds to the electronic version of the Bachelor's thesis in accordance with paragraph 5
. 4Thepaper version is for assessment purposes only and is not part of the examination file. 5Whensubmitting the Bachelor's thesis, the examination candidate
must be enrolled in the relevant degree program or admitted as a second student.

(10) 1Theassessment of the Bachelor's thesis is usually announced to the examination candidate within nine weeks of submission of the thesis by the ZIB Jura as the responsible examination office at the University of Cologne or at the responsible examination office at İstanbul Altınbaş University. 2Ifthis regulation is deviated from, the reasons must be recorded.

(11) 1ABachelor's thesis graded "unsatisfactory" or worse or deemed unsatisfactory may be repeated once with a new topic. 2Asecond
repetition of a failed Bachelor's thesis is excluded. 3Ifa Bachelor's thesis is not passed after one repetition, the degree program is finally
not passed. 4Therepetition of a passed Bachelor's thesis is excluded.

(12) 1Thenotification of failure of the Bachelor's thesis will be formally sent to the examination candidate by the Chair of the Examination Board of the University of Cologne to the postal address stored in the campus management system or electronically. 2Thenotification shall include information on legal remedies.

(13) 1The subject matterand results of the Bachelor's thesis must be presented and defended in a final colloquium in front of the thesis supervisor and another examiner. 2As a rule, thefinal colloquium shall take place in presence. 3Itis possible tohold it in whole or in part in electronic communication with the consent of all participants. 4Thepresentation should not last longer than 12 minutes and the subsequent discussion should not last longer than 10 minutes. 5Onlystudents who have passed the Bachelor's thesis may take part in the final colloquium. 6Thegrade for the final colloquium is calculated in accordance with Section 18 (2) sentence 2 and represents 40% of the M11 module grade. 7 Afailed final colloquium may be repeated once. 8Studentsfrom the same degree program should be allowed to attend the final colloquium as listeners, provided the examination candidate does not object. 9Theparticipation of members of the audience does not extend to the discussion and announcement of the examination result.

(14) If members of İstanbul Altınbaş University are involved as examiners for the Bachelor's thesis module, the provisions of the study and examination regulations of the Faculty of Law for the Law degree program at İstanbul Altınbaş University, as amended, shall also apply, unless otherwise stated in these regulations.

§ 22 Audit Committee

(1) 1TheNarrow Faculty of the Faculty of Law elects an Examination Board forthe degree program governed by these regulations. 2TheExamination Board is responsible for
all modules regulated by these regulations. 3In the case ofpolyvalent modules, it shall take into account the regulations of the offering faculty.

(2) 1TheExamination Board shall ensure that the provisions of these regulations, including their appendices, are complied with. 2Inparticular, itshall decide on
appeals insofar as preliminary proceedings pursuant to Section 110 JustizG NRW are admissible against decisions in accordance with Section 68 VwGO, as well as on admissions to examinations, the proper
conduct of examinations, the appointment of examiners and assessors, examination withdrawals, cheating and disorderly conduct, decisions on
compensation for disadvantages and protective provisions, invalidity of examinations and revocation of degrees. 3It shall report to the Faculty of Law
on the development of the examination system in the degree program on an ad hoc basis and, if necessary, make suggestions for amending these regulations as part of quality assurance. 4The provisionsof these regulations on the responsibility of the Chairperson of the Examination Board remain unaffected by this.

(3) The Examination Board is composed of the following twelve members with voting rights:
1. the program representative of the degree program at the University of Cologne and the program representative of the degree program at İstanbul Altınbaş University;
2. four members from the group of university lecturers, whereby two must come from the Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne and two from the Faculty of Law at İstanbul Altınbaş University;
3. one member from the group of academic staff members of the Faculty of Law of the University of Cologne and one member from the group of academic staff members of the Faculty of Law of İstanbul Altınbaş University;
4. one member from the group of technical and administrative staff members of the Faculty of Law of the University of Cologne and one member from the group of technical and administrative staff members of the Faculty of Law of İstanbul Altınbaş University;
5. two members from the group of students. They must be enrolled in this degree program during their term of office.

(4) 1Thetwo program representatives are equal chairpersons of the Examination Board, who decide by mutual agreement unless one chairperson is solely responsible. 2The program representative of the University of Cologne is responsible for the tasks assigned to the chairperson in these regulations, with the exception of the tasks according to § 21 of these regulations. 3The examination board chairperson of the partner university to whom the subject position is assigned in accordance with Section 21 (4) is responsible for the tasks in accordance with Section 21.4Theexamination board elects a deputy chairperson from among the members in accordance with Paragraph 3 No. 2.

(5) 1Adeputy shall be elected for each of the members in accordance with paragraph 3 no. 2 to 5. 2Thedeputies shall act if the members from the corresponding group are unable to attend.

(6) The chairpersons may invite other persons, in particular deputy members, to attend meetings of the Audit Committee, provided this appears relevant and the majority of the voting members present do not object.

(7) 1Themembers and their deputies in accordance with paragraph 3 sentence 1 shall be elected by the Faculty by group. 2Thegroups have the right to nominate
. 3Themembers from the group of university lecturers, from the group of academic staff and
from the group of technical and administrative staff are elected for three years, the members from the group of students for one year. 4Re-election
is permitted. 5Theterm of office of a deputy ends with the term of office of the corresponding member. 6Ifa member or deputy member resigns prematurely in accordance with paragraph 3 nos. 2 to 5, a successor shall be elected for the remaining term of office.

(8) 1TheAudit Committee is quorate if the chairperson or their deputy and at least two other members with voting rights are present. 2Ifthe deputy chairperson chairs a meeting because the respective chairperson is unable to attend, his or her deputy shall attend the meeting as a voting member in accordance with paragraph 4. 3TheAudit Committee passes resolutions by a simple majority of those present and entitled to vote. 4In the event ofa tie, the chairperson has the casting vote. 5Themembers of the Examination Board from the group of technical and administrative staff only have the right to vote in matters of teaching if they perform corresponding functions at the university and have special experience in the respective area; such experience is to be assumed in particular if employees fulfill the status of examiners in accordance with Section 65 (1) sentence 2 HG. 6Thechairpersons shall decide onthe existence of these requirements at the beginning of the member's term of office and, in cases of doubt, the Rectorate. 7Themembers from the student group only vote on pedagogical-academic decisions, in particular on the recognition of examination results and on objection decisions, if they fulfill the examiner status according to § 65 paragraph 1 sentence 2 HG.

(9) 1Themeetings of the Examination Board are not public and are generally held in person. 2Thechairpersons may decide that the meeting shall take place in electronic communication. 3Thedecision shall become ineffective if half of the members of the Examination Board object to it before the meeting. 4In the case ofmeetings in electronic communication, the chairpersons may also decide that resolutions are to be passed in electronic communication; this may be deviated from by a resolution of the committee. 5 Paragraph8 sentence 1 applies to meetings held via electronic communication with the proviso that attendance means participation in the meeting. 6Resolutionsmay also be passed by way of circulation, provided no member objects. 7Themembers and their deputies are subject to official secrecy. 8Ifthey are not in public service, they must be sworn to secrecy by one of the chairpersons.


(10) 1Themembers of the Examination Board and their deputies have the right to be present during examinations. 2Theright to be present does not extend to the discussion of the examination result.

(11) The ZIB Jura is available to the examination board for the organizational handling of examination procedures.

(12) 1Thechairpersons of the examination board, or their deputies if they are unable to attend, represent the examination board, convene the meetings of the examination board, chair them and implement the resolutions passed there. 2TheExamination Board may delegate the completion of its tasks for all regular cases to the chairperson of the partner university at which the tasks arise. 3Inurgent cases, the chairpersons may conduct a vote by circulation. 4Theymay make decisions that cannot be postponedin place of the Examination Board; the Examination Board must be informed of this immediately; the Examination Board may revoke the decision; any rights of third parties that have already arisen remain unaffected. 5Decisionson appeals are reserved for the Examination Committee. 6Minutes shall be taken foreach meeting of the Examination Committee.

(13) The chairpersons of the Examination Board shall publish instructions, deadlines and time limits as well as other notifications from the Examination Board, which do not only concern
individual persons, with legally binding effect on the faculty website, via the campus management system or by other suitable means.

§ 23 Examiners and assessors

(1) 1Theexaminers are appointed from the group of university lecturers and from among the members and affiliates of both the
Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University in accordance with Section 65 (1) HG. 2Examinationsmay only be assessed
by persons who themselves possess at least the qualification to be determined by the examination or an equivalent qualification. 3Examiners who have resigned, been dismissed or retired
may be reappointed as examiners for a period of one year after the end of the semester in which they resigned from the University of Cologne. 4Onlythose who have obtained a relevant degree at least at Bachelor's level or an equivalent qualification at a university may be appointed as
assessors.

(2) 1TheExamination Board appoints the examiners and the assessors. 2 Itmay delegate the appointment to the chairperson. 3Theappointment of examiners and
assessors must be recorded. 4 Notwithstandingthe provision in sentence 1, the following applies: A lecturer is the examiner of the course for which
he or she is responsible and for which he or she is responsible, unless the examination board appoints an examiner otherwise.

(3) 1TheChair of the Examination Board appoints the examiners responsible for the Bachelor's thesis from among the professors, associate professors, honorary professors, junior professors and private lecturers in accordance with paragraph 1. 2Injustified exceptional cases, the Examination Board decides on the appointment of further examiners who meet the requirements in accordance with Section 65 (1) HG. 3 Itmay delegate the appointment to the chairperson. 4Examiners who have left theUniversity of Cologne may be reappointed as examiners for the Bachelor's thesis for a period of one year after the end of the semester in which they left the University of Cologne. 5TheExamination Board may extend this period upon justified request. 6 Itmay delegate this decision to the chairperson. 7University lecturersfrom a university linked by a partnership or cooperation agreement may be appointed as subject supervisors for a Bachelor's thesis upon justified application by the university lecturers representing a subject. 8Inspecial cases, the Chairperson of the Examination Board may appoint examiners who are members of another university with which there is no partnership agreement as assessors/second assessors for the Bachelor's thesis upon a justified request from the subject representative. 9Theappointment of examiners for the Bachelor's thesis must be recorded.


(4) 1Theexaminers shall name the work and aids permitted for the examinations they conduct and shall announce these in a suitable manner in good time, at the latest when the examination date of the respective examination is announced. 2Ifno agreement can be reached, the examination board shall decide.

(5) 1Examinersare independent of instructions in their examination activities. 2Theyand, if applicable, the assessors are subject to official secrecy. 3Ifthey are not in
public service, they must be sworn to secrecy by the chairperson of the examination committee.

§ 24 Deception, violation of regulations

(1) 1Abreach of regulations is committed by anyone who cheats or attempts to cheat in an examination or uses or carries unauthorized aids in an examination. 2Theconsequences of a breach of regulations may include:
1. The person who committed the breach of regulations may be required to retake the examination to which the breach of regulations relates;
2. Examination performances to which the breach of regulations relates may be declared "unsatisfactory" (0 points);
3. In the event of multiple or other serious attempts to cheat, the student who committed the breach of regulations may also be exmatriculated; in particularly serious cases, the examination in which the examination to which the breach of regulations relates was taken may be declared to have been definitively failed.

(2) 1Ifthere is an initial suspicion of plagiarism in a coursework or examination, the examination board may have further checks carried out, in particular with the help of plagiarism detection software, even without the express consent of the
examination candidate. 2For this purpose,the submission of an
electronic version of the work may also be requested retrospectively. 3Notwithstandingsentence 1, the Examination Board may review random samples. 4Thetype of
random sample determination must be documented. 5Storagein databases of the plagiarism detection software beyond the end of the respective assessment procedure
requires the express consent of the student. 6Consentmust be given voluntarily and is not a prerequisite for examination registration, submission or
assessment. 7Theresult of the review is stored as part of the examination file.


(3) The examination board makes the necessary findings and decisions.

(4) In the event of deliberate cheating, the Examination Board may initiate fine proceedings in accordance with Section 63 (5) HG NRW; the responsibility for
carrying out the fine proceedings lies with the Chancellor of the University of Cologne in accordance with Sections 63 (5); 14 (2) HG NRW, to whom the Examination Board will refer the matter.

§ Section 25 Invalidity of examinations, revocation of the Bachelor's degree

(1) 1Ifthe requirements for admission to an examination werenot met without the examination candidate intending to deceive about this, and this fact only becomes known after the certificate has been issued, this deficiency shall be remedied by passing the examination. 2If the examination candidate hasdeliberately obtained admission wrongly, the examination board shall decide on the legal consequences in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (VwVfG NRW).

(2) If an examination candidate has cheated in an examination performance and this fact only becomes known after the certificate has been issued,
the examination board may subsequently withdraw the assessment for the examination performance in which the examination candidate has cheated under the
conditions of § 48 VwVfG NRW and impose a sanction appropriate to the severity of the cheating in accordance with § 24.

(3) The Bachelor's degree may be revoked if it is found to have been obtained by deception or if essential requirements for the award
have been mistakenly considered to have been met.

(4) 1Theexamination candidate must be given the opportunity to comment before a decision is made in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3. 2Theexamination board shall be responsiblefor the decision and shall make its decision in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (VwVfG NRW). 3Adecision is excluded after a period of five years from the date of the certificate.

(5) 1Theincorrect certificate and all incorrect attachments shall be withdrawn and, if necessary, reissued. 2Ifthe degree program as a whole has beendeclared failed,
the academic degree shall be withdrawn by the Faculty of Law and the Bachelor's certificate shall be confiscated.

§ 26 Examination file, inspection of files

(1) 1Anexamination file is kept by the examination board foreach examination candidate. 2Theexamination file documents in particular the examination attempts, the examination papers, the examiners' related reports, the examination records, the examination results, grade calculations and copies of the
certificates and diplomas. The examination file is kept in writing or in whole or in part electronically.

(2) An examination candidate can obtain information on the status of the examination results at any time within the scope of organizational possibilities.

(3) 1Afterthe announcement of an examination result, each examination candidate or a corresponding authorized representative shall be granted electronic or physical access to their written performance in this examination and the related reports and correction notes of the examiners as well as the minutes of oral examinations upon written or electronic request. 2Anexamination candidate or his or her authorized representative is entitled to either make copies or photographs of the documents or to request these free of charge as part of the inspection. 3Thefurther procedure for inspection, including a reasonable deadline for the inspection request, shall be regulated by the examination committee. 4Afterthe specified deadlines have expired, inspection is generally only possible if an examination candidate is demonstrably not responsible for missing the deadline. 5As arule, there is no further right to information.

(4) 1Theexamination file shall be kept until the end of the fifth year following de-registration from this degree program and then offered to the responsible archive
; if the archive refuses to accept it, it must be destroyed. 2Theacademic degrees awarded and a cataloged collection
of the certificates and diplomas issued may be kept ina register until the end of the fiftieth year following the end of the course of study; sentence 1, second half-sentence applies
accordingly. 3Theexamination file and the register may be kept in electronic form, to which sentences 1 to 2 apply accordingly.

§ 26a Remonstration, reconsideration of the valuation

(1) 1Objections tothe assessment of an individual assignment may be submitted to the examiner in writing or electronically within one month of notification of the result by the examination office and the possibility of
viewing or collecting the work. 2In doing so,the objections to the assessment must be specifically
and comprehensibly justified. 3As long asthe student has not been granted access to the work despite submitting a request, the deadline for remonstration
is suspended. 4Ifthe assessed work is handed out, it must be attached to the remonstration. 5Ifthe result of a performance is announced during the lecture-free period, the deadline begins on the first lecture day of the following semester. 6Theexaminer shall decide on the remonstration, taking into account the reasons for the remonstration; they are only responsible for a substantive discussion if effective references to (alleged) errors or legal errors are given in the reasons for the remonstration.

(2) 1Thepossibility of objecting to the assessment of an examination performance remains unaffected. 2Theobjection period is suspended as long as the remonstration procedure
is pending.

(3) Remonstrations should be processed within one month of the expiry of the remonstration deadline

§ 27 Degree and degree documents

(1) 1Thedegree program is successfully completed when all required examinations have been passed and the credit points have been earned in accordance with § 6. 2Acertificate shall be issued for the successful completion of the course. 3Thecertificate shall be signed by the Dean of the Faculties of Law of the Universities of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş and by the Chairpersons of the Examination Board and shall include all coursework from both study sections. 4Thegrades are stated in words and numerically. 5Itis issued with the date of the day on which the last examination achievement was completed or recognized. 6Ifthe Bachelor's thesis is the last examination achievement, the date of submission shall apply. 7Thecertificate shall indicate whether achievements were completed as part of the degree course at the University of Cologne, recognized in accordance with § 11a or credited in accordance with § 11b or waived on the basis of transitional regulations in the event of amendments to the examination regulations by resolution of the Examination Board.

(2) 1Togetherwith the certificate, the student will be issued with the Bachelor's degree certificate, which certifies the award of the degree in accordance with § 3; this bears the date
of the certificate. 2TheBachelor's certificate is signed by the Dean of the Faculty of Law and the Chairperson of the Examination Board and bears the seal of the Faculty.

(3) 1ADiploma Supplement in German and English is issued togetherwith the certificate and the Bachelor's degree certificate, which provides information about the subject profile of the degree program completed at
and the academic and professional qualifications acquired with the degree. 2In addition, theDiploma Supplement describes
the degree program completed and provides information about the faculty. 3TheTranscript of Records is part ofthe Diploma Supplement.


(4) 1Ifa student hasnot passed or definitively failed the degree program or has dropped out, or if he or she changes universities, a certificate (Transcript of Records) will be issued to him or her
upon request stating the examinations taken, the supplementary studies and achievements, the grades and the
credit points earned. 2Ifapplicable, itmust indicate that the degree course has not been passed or has been definitively failed.

(5) 1Thedegree certifies that students have the foreign language skills required for admission to the state compulsory examination. 2Thejudicial examination office at the higher regional court at which the student applies for admission to the compulsory state examination is responsiblefor the recognition
of foreign language competence.

§ Section 28 Transitional provisions

(1) These regulations apply to all students who are enrolled at the University of Cologne for the Bachelor's degree program regulated by these regulations or who have been admitted as
secondary students.

(2) The following transitional regulations apply to students who began their studies in the Bachelor's degree program in German-Turkish Law at this faculty before these regulations came into force and have not interrupted their studies.

(3) For students who were enrolled in accordance with the examination regulations for the degree programme dated 24 February 2016 before these regulations came into force and who have already completed the first stage of their studies, the first stage of their studies will be recognized in full.

(4) For students who were enrolled in accordance with the examination regulations for the degree program dated 24 February 2016 before these regulations came into force and who have not yet completed the
first study section, the following applies:
1. the modules Module Fundamentals of the German Civil Code using the example of the sales contract (M1), Module Contract, Debt and Liability (M2) and Module Property and Assets (M3) in accordance with Section 9 (3) no. 1 - 3 of the examination regulations for the German-Turkish Law degree program of the Faculties of Law of the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University dated 24.02.2016, the intermediate examination in Civil Law is deemed to have been passed,
2. the modules Module State (M7), Module International and European Law (M8) and a partial module examination of the Module Administration (M9) in accordance with § 9 paragraph 3 no. 7 - 9 of the Examination Regulations for the German-Turkish Law degree program of the Faculties of Law of the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University dated 24.02.2016 are passed, the intermediate examination in Public Law is deemed to have been passed,
3. the modules Module Fundamentals of German Criminal Law (M5) and Module Advanced German Criminal Law (M6) are passed in accordance with Section 9 (3) nos. 5 and 6 of the examination regulations for the German-Turkish Law degree program of the Faculties of Law of the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University dated 24.02.2016, the
intermediate examination in criminal law is deemed to have been passed;
4. Recognition of the in-depth examinations is based on the average grade of the respective modules.

(5) For students who were enrolled before these regulations came into force in accordance with the examination regulations for the law degree program of the law
faculties of the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University dated 24.02.2016 and have not yet completed the first stage of their studies,
applies without prejudice to paragraph 5:
a) A completed examination in the area of Fundamentals of Law is recognized as a module examination in Module 9 "Fundamentals" in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
b) A completed examination in the subject BGB AT/Schuldrecht AT is recognized in Module 1 "Contract, Debt, Assets and Liability" both as a module part examination in the subject BGB AT and as a module part examination in the subject Schuldrecht AT I mit Kaufrecht in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
c) A completed examination in the subject Schuldrecht BT (Gesetzliche Schuldverhältnisse) is recognized in Module 1 "Contract, Debt, Property and Liability" as a partial module examination in the subject Gesetzliche Schuldverhältnisse in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
d) A completed examination in the subject Schuldrecht BT (Vertragliche Schuldverhältnisse) is recognized in Module 1 "Contract, Debt, Property and Liability" as a partial module examination in the subject Vertragliche Schuldverhältnisse and Schuldrecht AT II in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
e) A completed examination in the subject of Property Law is recognized in Module 1 "Contract, Debt, Property and Liability" as a partial module examination in the subject of Property Law and Credit Security Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix; f) A completed examination in the subject of Criminal Law I is recognized in Module 3 "General Criminal Liability, Bodily Injury and Property Offences" as a partial module examination in the subject of Criminal Law I in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
g) A completed examination in the subject of Criminal Law II is recognized in Module 3 "General Criminal Liability, Bodily Injury and Property Offences" as a partial module examination in the subject of Criminal Law II in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
h) A completed examination in the subject of Criminal Law III is recognized in Module 3 "General Criminal Liability, Bodily Injury and Property Offences" as a partial module examination in the subject of Criminal Law III in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
i) A completed examination in the subject of Constitutional Law I is recognized in Module 2 "State and Administration" as a partial module examination in the subject of Fundamental Rights incl. Constitutional Appeal in accordance with the module overview in the appendix. Constitutional Complaint according to the module overview in the appendix;
j) A completed examination in the subject of Constitutional Law II is recognized in Module 2 "State and Administration" as a partial module examination in the subject of Constitutional Organization Law with Constitutional Procedure Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
k) A completed examination in the subject of General Administrative Law is recognized in Module 2 "State and Administration" as a partial module examination in the subject of General Administrative Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
l) A completed examination in the subject of Private International Law is recognized in Module 4 "International Conflict of Laws" as a partial module examination in the subject of Private International Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
m) Proof of participation in the course German Terminology Course is recognized in Module 4 "International Conflict of Laws" as a partial module examination in the subject German Terminology Course in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
n) A completed examination in the subject Turkish Legal Terminology Course for Advanced Students is recognized in Module 6 "Turkish Law" as a partial module examination in the subject Turkish Legal Terminology Course for Advanced Students in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
o) A completed examination in the subject Introduction to Turkish Civil Law is recognized in Module 6 "Turkish Law" as a partial module examination in the subject Introduction to Turkish Civil Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
p) A completed examination in the subject Introduction to Turkish Public Law is recognized in Module 6 "Turkish Law" as a partial module examination in the subject Introduction to Turkish Public Law in accordance with the module overview in the appendix;
q) 1Smallinterim examination papers passed before the entry into force of these regulations are deemed to be passed homework in accordance with the module overview in the appendix. 2Major intermediate examination papers passed before the entry into force of these regulations shall be deemed to have been passed as homework in accordance with the module overview in the appendix. r) Proof of completion of a practical period of study shall be recognized as a passed examination performance "Six-week internship in the administration of justice, administration or company in module 8 "Legal Technology and Professional Qualifications" in accordance with the module overview in the appendix.

(6) For students who were enrolled before these regulations came into force in accordance with the examination regulations for the Law degree program of the Faculties of Law
of the University of Cologne and İstanbul Altınbaş University dated 24.02.2016 and have not yet completed the first stage of their studies,
notwithstanding paragraphs 5 and 6, the in-depth examinations can be taken if the following achievements have been successfully completed:
a) 3 end-of-semester examinations in civil law to choose from BGB AT, Schuldrecht AT I, Vertragliche Schuldverhältnisse/Schuldrecht AT II (two-hour lectures in each case, completion by only one examination for both lectures), Gesetzliche Schuldverhältnisse, Sachenrecht/Kreditsicherungsrecht (two-hour lectures in each case, relevant exam is only that of the lecture
Property Law)
b) 2 end-of-semester exams in the area of public law to choose from Fundamental Rights, Constitutional Organization Law with Constitutional Procedure Law, Administrative Law AT
c) 2 end-of-semester exams in the area of Criminal Law to choose from Criminal Law I, Criminal Law II, Criminal Law III.

§ 29 Publication and entry into force

(1) These regulations are published in the Official Notices of the University of Cologne.


(2) 1Theseregulations enter into force with effect from 01.04.2024. 2Theexamination regulations for the German-Turkish Bachelor's degree program in Law
of the Faculties of Law of the University of Cologne and Istanbul Kemerburgaz University dated 24.02.2016 (Amtliche Mitteilungen 41/2016) shall expire at the same time.

Issued on the basis of the resolution of the Rectorate of the University of Cologne dated January 31, 2021

Cologne, September 23, 2024
The Dean of the Faculty of Law of the University of Cologne

signed
University Professor Dr. Christian Rolfs